Comments on: Twitter: worth using against Mail columnists but not for Professor Nutt?

By: admin

admin — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 20:23:11 +0000

Thanks for your comment. Glad to know someone else is as outraged as I am. I just hope some of his colleagues are going to step up to support him

By: adrianwake

adrianwake — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 16:29:43 +0000

I joined the facebook group and have also emailed Alan Johnson. Emailing may be more effective than Twitter.

By: Bill Hilton

Bill Hilton — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 15:47:03 +0000

Actually, it is having a steady, slow burn on Twitter. The fact it hasn't picked up harder and faster is probably a lot to do with the fact that the news broke late on Friday afternoon, when many Brits were winding down for the week and the trending topics list was dominated by US tags.

If some more members of Nutt's committee go next week, I'd expect it to pick up dramatically. At the moment the whole issue is a bit like a volcano that's smoking and grumbling and looks like it might explode fairly soon – or not, as the case may be.

By: admin

admin — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 10:58:53 +0000

Thanks for your comment, really appreciate it. I do hope you’re right, and it may just be a reflection of who I follow, it’s just that the other issues I mentioned were picked up very quickly by people who don’t seem to have picked up on this. Hopefully the volcano will bubble over soon

By: uberVU - social comments

uberVU - social comments — Sat, 31 Oct 2009 10:43:56 +0000

Social comments and analytics for this post…

This post was mentioned on Twitter by jamesseddon: Angry blog post: Twitter: good enough to be used against Mail columnists but not for Professor Nutt? http://j.mp/1Mpf5R...